更新时间:
“muqian,woguozuhejiashifuzhugongnengyijinrushichangguimohuayingyongjieduan,NOAdengxiangguangongnengyingyongxunsupuji。raner,jishuchengshuduyushichangreducunzaipiancha。zuhejiashifuzhuchanpincongkeyongdaohaoyongrengyouchaju,cheqixuanchuanbianjiemohu、yonghurenzhipianchadengwentiriyituxian。bufenjiashiyuanhunxiaojiashifuzhuyuzidongjiashigainian,yinwuyongjiashifuzhugongnengdaozhidejiaotongshigupinfa。”huanghekejixueyuankezuojiaoshouzhangxiangzaijieshou《zhengquanribao》jizhecaifangshibiaoshi,“cicigonganbu、kejibudefashengzhizaijiuzhengshichangwudaoxingxuanchuan,duicheqitichuxuanchuanguifanyaoqiu,youzhuyuxingyejiankangfazhan。jinguanduanqineikenengyingxiangcheqixiaoliang,danchangyuanlaikan,youzhuyujianligengzhenshideshichangrenzhihegenghelidejingzhenghuanjing。”46. 简言之,本席无法理解当事人选择法院地和/或谨慎行事如何能转化为第一阶段的提高门槛。本席认为,香港法院的谨慎以及任何“涉外因素 ”或法院礼让考量, 在第二阶段才起作用,而非第一阶段。